STAT+: OpenEvidence’s JAMA paper leaves open questions
Reported by STAT News · all stories from statnews.com
Editorial digest
A study published in JAMA regarding OpenEvidence continues to generate unresolved questions. The article examines the lingering uncertainties surrounding the company's research findings.
Digests are written in our own words from the publisher's headline — we never reproduce article text. Read the original for the full reporting.
Read the full story at STAT News →More like this
Other stories our editors tagged with the same themes.
- Trusted health newsroom10/13/2026
STAT+: Takeaways from an evaluation of Google’s diagnostic chatbot, AMIE
An assessment of Google's diagnostic AI chatbot, AMIE, has provided key findings.
- Trusted health newsroom9/30/2026
STAT+: HHS announces new efforts to speed up, expand clinical trials with AI
HHS initiatives aim to accelerate and broaden clinical research with artificial intelligence.
- Trusted health newsroom9/10/2026
STAT+: Can AI save rural health care?
The potential role of artificial intelligence in supporting rural healthcare is being explored.
- Trusted health newsroom9/11/2026
STAT+: An AI tool aims to catch harder-to-detect heart attacks in EKGs
An artificial intelligence solution helps detect subtle heart attacks using EKG scans.
- Trusted health newsroom9/9/2026
STAT+: Can AI fix health care? In the chaos of emergency rooms, the technology comes up short
AI faces limitations in emergency rooms, not fully resolving chaos.
- Trusted health newsroom8/25/2026
STAT+: AI is good at catching drug theft at hospitals, but only when humans do their part
Artificial intelligence effectively detects drug theft in hospitals when paired with human involvement.